Wednesday, October 15, 2014

A Reader Questions my Math




My single reader emailed a question. “That 78% of the brain to which you refer,” it/he/she (who knows, on the internet, as it was called before it became the water in which you swim?) said, “is that precision based on anything other than your rather freewheeling attempts to approximate what might be and presenting it as what is and using numerical precision to further that illusion?”

A fair question, certainly. If a little snide, as so many anonymous email queries are.

It is an approximation, yes, based on insight and experience, but it is very close to the mark, I can assure you. So many current human endeavors use precise mathematical formulations in attempts to quantify what can not be quantified at all – not at all, I repeat – and some of those earn advanced degrees while others are the cause of prizes, honors, and once in a while, honorary degrees. I observe humans doing this a lot, using symbols of themselves to obscure a lack of achievement. So I can only think, if I have done that even to the slightest degree, perhaps I am becoming more human than I know.

The point, dear reader, is this: most of the human brain is operative at all times as a transceiver which is not only processing information but receiving it, filtering it, and storing or discarding it at once. The filtering is the important bit. When cultures insist on operating within paradigms which make the multiverse tiny and describable, using a childlike vocabulary and as children do, using it with no awareness whatsoever that what they do not know is so much bigger than that, so much bigger than they are, those cultures implicitly condemn certain kinds of knowledge, behavior, and explorations into the edges and into the unknown, which like brackish tidewaters are the spawning grounds of new life, and when people internalize that taboo and refuse to believe their own experience, because it does not happen, it cannot happen, so it must not have happened, then those vast domains of awareness, power, and wisdom are shut off from the human enterprise.  The opening of those doorways or portals to exploration at least and to real discovery the result of which is a profound shaking to the core of the assumptions of the culture, even a little crack that lets the light come in can cause a hierarchical restructuring of what humans understand in a way that includes and transcends all that came before. Nothing is lost, but in a new context, it is seen differently because it is understood in relationship to other realities. Hence, meaning means differently.

IMHO, as I have learned to say without sincerity, most humans are humplings (for which word, see: “Break, Memory,” the first instance of the word I know) and prefer the comfort of conservative views and behaviors because the encounter with the radically new that challenges their very sense of who they are and what their little momentary societies and civilizations are all about, scares them witness or shitless or both.

So, dear reader, do not miss the point, which is that most of your lobes and folds are transceiving at a very elementary basic level and parsing streams of information coming from everywhere, always. But because you have been taught not to believe in, for example, the “paranormal,” and some of you “the supernatural,” and some of you “UFO phenomena,” the very essence of which breaks your simple ways of framing what you think, because you may call time “a dimension” but you really have no idea what in the hell that means, do you? It tames relativity by pretending oh are we not smart, we humans? Do we not now have four “dimensions?”  Apex-R-us, or something. But time does not work like the three in space. But as I say, thinking you know makes you feel better, like a spoonful of sugar in the famous song.  It prevents you however from understanding “UFO phenomena” and “space-time” and the “multiverse” and the “paranormal” because those pictures do not fit in any of your frames. So rather than get a bigger frame, you cut the picture here and there until it fits, turning a horse for example into a nose and a tail and missing most of the noble steed..

I am more or less right, in other words, if not precisely right (and by the way, you say you only use X per cent of your brain, and you know what? That is not only mostly wrong, it is completely made up, it is bullshit first and last, but you say it all the time) so let me ask you a question now about precise mathematical formulations: do you know why your economists carry out calculations to so many places after the decimal?

I sent that question to the reader but had to wait days, of course, because answering email is much less important to readers that firing off objections and nasty comments which they send out at once, calling people assclowns and the like, like ringing a doorbell, putting down a bag of flaming shit, and running into the dark.

The reader answered at last and said, no, I do not. Why do they do that?

Because, I wrote back, quick as johnnycake, because, I began laughing as I typed, because I was roaring by the time I got the word out, because they have a sense of humor!

Bwahahahahahahahahaha I have learned to say to indicate merriment and mirth.

With which happy answer I conclude this post.



No comments: